HR 2267
Online Casino Gambling
Latest News
Online Casino Reviews
Online Casino Bonuses
International Casinos
Online Casino Games
Casino Payments
FOG BLOG

Site Highlights
Microgaming Casinos
New Online Casinos
Real Money Gambling
Online Gambling US
USA Gambling Sites
Blackjack Casinos

Main Sections
Online Casinos
Online Poker
Online Bingo

Site Services
About Us
Contact Us


HR 2267


Consumer Protection and Enforcement Act of 2009


Consumer Protection and Enforcement Act of 2009


HR 2267


Consumer Protection and Enforcement Act of 2009

 

Special Hearing for HR 2267 Held - 12-05-09


December 5 - A special hearing was held through the House Financial Services Committee on Thursday as a means to bring forward information about Barney Frank's Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection and Enforcement Act of 2009 (aka HR 2267).

The HR 2267 hearing showcased how it was not only possible but also imperative to introduce a regulated online gambling industry in the United States.

Speakers on the subject included Barney Frank himself; Parry Aftab of WiredSafety, and internet safety and help group; Professor Malcolm Sparrow who penned the Harvard study "Can Internet Gambling be Effectively Regulated? Managing the Risks", as well as the chairman of Youbet.com, Michael Brodsky.

"The status quo offers no meaningful assurances that consumers will be protected," said Parry Aftab. "There are a number of technologies routinely used in other industries that are easily adaptable to online gambling sites. They are real, proven and in use today. They are also improving by the minute."

Dr. Sparrow, who served as a Detective Chief Inspector with the British Police for many years said: "At a minimum, even an imperfect legalization and regulatory regime for online gambling would give Americans much more protection than they have now."

Republican Representative Spencer Bachus quite predictably presented an anti online gambling view and dramatically produced a letter from the Federal Bureau of Investigations stating that collusion is possible at online gambling sites, adding that little was done to counter the problem.

The Poker Players Alliance immediately reacted to these claims, saying that: "The largest poker sites all use software to detect collusion. If a site is subjected to allegations that players are cheating, few players will play at that site."

"Every concern that the letter raises is better addressed by licensing and regulation than by prohibition," said John Pappas of the PPA. "The letter misconstrues much about the current state of online poker, but it does so in a way that clearly makes the case for why federal oversight is necessary."



Fair Online Gambling Related Articles:

>> Australian MP Causes Online Gambling Uproar - 12-03-09
>> Delay in UIGEA Implementation - 11-28-09
>> Cryptologic Reports Drop in Revenues - 11-26-09
>> Bookies Return Irish Bets - 11-25-09


Submit This Article To Your Social Network

 
Furl
 
Simpy
 
Y! MyWeb
 
 
OnlyWire
 
Del.icio.us
 
Digg
 
Google
 
Spurl
 
StumbleUpon
 
Redit
 
Technocrati
 

Copyright © and Disclaimer 2002-2008 Fair Online Gambling
12/5/2009 8:04:46 PM